OCaml versus F# .NET Core fastest programs

Always look at the source code.

These are only the fastest programs. Look at the other programs. They may seem more-like a fair comparison to you.

pidigits
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	0.74	6,144	593	0.78	0% 0% 100% 4%
F# .NET Core	0.97	34,372	905	0.98	1% 96% 1% 3%
fannkuch-redux
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	8.52	19,072	1004	34.08	100% 100% 100% 100%
F# .NET Core	8.91	34,216	1097	34.78	98% 99% 99% 94%
n-body
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	6.72	1,464	1251	6.76	0% 100% 0% 1%
F# .NET Core	6.97	34,776	1617	7.28	100% 1% 3% 1%
reverse-complement
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	1.66	34,044	1368	4.25	61% 65% 61% 69%
F# .NET Core	1.53	1,030,248	1140	4.24	95% 89% 35% 58%
binary-trees
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	4.04	152,736	751	11.19	39% 77% 68% 93%
F# .NET Core	2.71	697,592	635	9.30	89% 88% 82% 84%
mandelbrot
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	7.56	4,620	717	30.12	100% 100% 99% 100%
F# .NET Core	3.77	63,096	933	14.76	98% 97% 98% 98%
fasta
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	3.27	203,380	1189	3.31	1% 0% 0% 100%
F# .NET Core	1.13	77,452	1350	4.24	96% 96% 90% 94%
regex-redux
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	14.84	901,904	637	15.29	100% 0% 1% 1%
F# .NET Core	4.37	985,812	599	6.26	78% 27% 17% 21%
spectral-norm
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	5.36	3,436	377	5.37	0% 0% 100% 0%
F# .NET Core	1.56	33,784	853	5.83	94% 92% 96% 92%
k-nucleotide
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	14.87	255,560	1833	40.68	48% 50% 86% 90%
F# .NET Core	3.95	182,004	1907	12.46	94% 78% 78% 66%
OCaml	The OCaml native-code compiler, version 4.11.0
F# .NET Core	.NET Core SDK 3.1.301 Host Version: 3.1.5; Commit: 65cd789777 <ServerGarbageCollection>true