OCaml versus F# .NET Core fastest programs

Always look at the source code.

These are only the fastest programs. Look at the other programs. They may seem more-like a fair comparison to you.

n-body
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	21.68	1,556	1251	21.89	0% 100% 1% 0%
F# .NET Core	22.76	36,616	1381	23.42	100% 1% 2% 1%
fannkuch-redux
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	16.41	29,028	1017	65.57	100% 100% 100% 100%
F# .NET Core	16.67	35,304	1097	64.61	93% 97% 98% 100%
reverse-complement
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	3.79	33,980	1368	8.76	63% 56% 52% 59%
F# .NET Core	2.94	1,031,376	1140	8.33	54% 37% 95% 97%
binary-trees
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	9.89	152,952	751	29.31	68% 52% 91% 84%
F# .NET Core	6.16	735,984	635	22.23	92% 92% 88% 88%
mandelbrot
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	13.78	5,008	717	54.96	100% 100% 99% 100%
F# .NET Core	6.47	65,488	897	25.26	97% 100% 97% 97%
regex-redux
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	25.39	969,100	637	25.58	0% 0% 1% 100%
F# .NET Core	8.03	1,069,132	599	11.16	53% 37% 32% 16%
pidigits
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	6.70	20,044	458	6.81	0% 70% 32% 0%
F# .NET Core	1.88	35,788	905	1.94	2% 2% 1% 98%
fasta
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	6.12	202,428	1189	6.17	0% 100% 1% 0%
F# .NET Core	1.70	107,124	1350	6.41	93% 99% 94% 92%
k-nucleotide
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	22.04	255,644	1833	63.13	54% 46% 93% 93%
F# .NET Core	5.97	183,292	1907	19.71	92% 72% 84% 83%
spectral-norm
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	15.70	3,740	377	17.99	7% 1% 100% 6%
F# .NET Core	4.11	34,960	853	15.91	96% 99% 97% 96%
OCaml	The OCaml native-code compiler, version 4.09.0
F# .NET Core	Microsoft (R) F# Compiler version 10.6.0.0 for F# 4.7 .NET Core SDK 3.0.100 Host Version: 3.0.0; Commit: 95a0a61858 <ServerGarbageCollection>true <ConcurrentGarbageCollection>true