OCaml versus F# .NET Core fastest programs

Always look at the source code.

These are only the fastest programs. Look at the other programs. They may seem more-like a fair comparison to you.

n-body
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	21.67	1,368	1251	23.26	3% 1% 100% 4%
F# .NET Core	22.20	33,660	1290	23.03	0% 100% 1% 3%
fannkuch-redux
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	16.37	19,584	1004	65.39	100% 100% 100% 100%
F# .NET Core	16.68	35,816	1097	65.52	98% 97% 100% 98%
reverse-complement
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	3.74	33,944	1368	8.90	62% 58% 60% 59%
F# .NET Core	2.93	1,031,696	1140	8.52	94% 45% 60% 90%
binary-trees
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	9.89	152,992	751	28.64	49% 64% 98% 79%
F# .NET Core	6.28	724,124	635	22.76	91% 93% 90% 88%
mandelbrot
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	14.02	5,048	717	55.89	99% 100% 100% 100%
F# .NET Core	5.78	65,644	933	22.72	99% 98% 98% 98%
regex-redux
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	25.23	901,944	637	27.09	4% 1% 100% 3%
F# .NET Core	7.87	971,632	599	11.18	64% 37% 28% 13%
fasta
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	6.00	199,124	1189	6.32	100% 1% 1% 4%
F# .NET Core	1.70	138,596	1350	6.45	95% 98% 93% 93%
spectral-norm
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	15.70	3,704	377	16.86	100% 3% 5% 0%
F# .NET Core	4.29	35,228	853	16.12	92% 92% 97% 94%
k-nucleotide
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	21.32	255,548	1833	59.79	91% 48% 100% 42%
F# .NET Core	5.80	183,360	1907	19.47	86% 66% 88% 96%
pidigits
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
OCaml	10.96	19,464	458	11.79	4% 1% 100% 2%
F# .NET Core	1.87	35,692	905	2.01	4% 2% 4% 98%
OCaml	The OCaml native-code compiler, version 4.10.0
F# .NET Core	.NET Core SDK 3.1.201 Host Version: 3.1.3; Commit: 4a9f85e9f8 <ServerGarbageCollection>true <ConcurrentGarbageCollection>true