Toit versus MicroPython

How the programs are written matters! Always look at the source code.

If the fastest programs are flagged * possible hand-written vector instructions or "unsafe" or naked ffi, does the host language matter? You might be more interested in the less optimised programs — more seconds, less gz source code.

fannkuch-redux
	elapsed	Mean or 95% CI
source	secs	cpu secs	mem	gz	make
Toit #8	2,130.66	2,130.68	72,884	416	1.03
MicroPython #8	2,797.32	2,796.85	3,613	414
n-body
	elapsed	Mean or 95% CI
source	secs	cpu secs	mem	gz	make
Toit #8	503.47	503.47	72,851	1129	1.15
MicroPython #8	1,732.37	1,732.05	5,976	1172
spectral-norm
	elapsed	Mean or 95% CI
source	secs	cpu secs	mem	gz	make
Toit #8	344.59	344.59	73,794	329	1.19
MicroPython #8	726.32	726.12	1,079,648	334
mandelbrot
	elapsed	Mean or 95% CI
source	secs	cpu secs	mem	gz	make
Toit #8	1,819.09	1,819.10	105,435	421	1.29
MicroPython #3	2,770.08	2,769.52	38,892	319
MicroPython #8		Timed Out
fasta
	elapsed	Mean or 95% CI
source	secs	cpu secs	mem	gz	make
Toit	74.48	77.34—83.63	433,250	965	1.14
Toit #8	410.66	410.36	334,307	728	1.10
MicroPython #8	638.54	637.95	267,743	730
k-nucleotide
	elapsed	Mean or 95% CI
source	secs	cpu secs	mem	gz	make
Toit #8		Timed Out
MicroPython #8		Timed Out
reverse-complement
	elapsed	Mean or 95% CI
source	secs	cpu secs	mem	gz	make
Toit	102.74	102.63—105.13	1,078,194	578	1.14
MicroPython #4		Empty
binary-trees [ Contentious. Different approaches. ]
	elapsed	Mean or 95% CI
source	secs	cpu secs	mem	gz	make
MicroPython #2	133.09	134.98—143.73	1,079,497	344
Toit #2	660.33	666.67—672.97	810,852	383	1.02
Toit	2,135.33	2,135.50	387,981	397	1.02
pidigits
	No programs	contribute your programs
regex-redux
	No programs	contribute your programs
Toit	v2.0.0-alpha.174
MicroPython	MicroPython v1.24.0 preview.44.ge9c898cb3