The Computer Language
Benchmarks Game

Racket versus Lisp SBCL fastest programs

Always look at the source code.

These are only the fastest programs. Do some of them use manually vectorized SIMD? Look at the other programs. They may seem more-like a fair comparison to you.

pidigits
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 1.18 69,132 1136 1.20 0% 1% 100% 1%
Lisp SBCL 3.34 607,800 493 3.38 0% 0% 100% 1%
regex-redux
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 9.37 1,293,512 729 19.99 62% 62% 22% 68%
Lisp SBCL 15.34 925,000 1972 31.90 42% 49% 63% 53%
reverse-complement
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 8.91 719,100 1030 8.96 0% 100% 0% 0%
Lisp SBCL 6.40 1,490,256 904 6.42 0% 0% 0% 100%
binary-trees
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 4.35 562,044 853 8.92 44% 47% 64% 50%
Lisp SBCL 2.84 529,972 932 7.09 73% 46% 63% 67%
fasta
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 7.94 69,148 1280 7.97 0% 0% 0% 100%
Lisp SBCL 4.71 18,072 1757 4.75 0% 0% 0% 100%
n-body
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 15.85 69,492 1689 15.91 0% 0% 100% 0%
Lisp SBCL 7.83 17,892 1403 7.88 0% 0% 100% 0%
spectral-norm
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 3.90 66,500 627 15.15 100% 96% 96% 96%
Lisp SBCL 1.44 15,680 762 5.72 99% 99% 99% 99%
mandelbrot
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 12.96 132,744 801 51.28 100% 99% 99% 99%
Lisp SBCL 4.09 46,684 2447 16.19 99% 99% 99% 99%
fannkuch-redux
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 32.59 68,152 1101 122.69 90% 93% 94% 100%
Lisp SBCL 9.63 32,388 1527 37.69 98% 95% 99% 99%
k-nucleotide
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 67.38 992,136 885 67.81 0% 100% 0% 0%
Lisp SBCL 10.29 512,240 2479 37.48 88% 99% 88% 90%
Racket

Welcome to Racket v8.0 [cs].

Lisp SBCL

SBCL 2.1.1