The Computer Language
Benchmarks Game

Racket versus Lisp SBCL fastest programs

Always look at the source code.

These are only the fastest programs. Do some of them use manually vectorized SIMD? Look at the other programs. They may seem more-like a fair comparison to you.

pidigits
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 1.18 68,656 1136 1.19 0% 100% 1% 0%
Lisp SBCL 3.34 607,800 493 3.38 0% 0% 100% 1%
regex-redux
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 12.48 1,787,916 729 23.03 45% 2% 100% 38%
Lisp SBCL 15.34 925,000 1972 31.90 42% 49% 63% 53%
reverse-complement
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 8.75 697,776 1030 9.00 0% 100% 0% 2%
Lisp SBCL 6.40 1,490,256 904 6.42 0% 0% 0% 100%
binary-trees
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 4.81 555,172 853 9.55 47% 46% 37% 69%
Lisp SBCL 2.84 529,972 932 7.09 73% 46% 63% 67%
fasta
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 7.98 67,896 1280 8.07 0% 100% 0% 1%
Lisp SBCL 4.71 18,072 1757 4.75 0% 0% 0% 100%
n-body
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 14.32 70,160 1689 14.37 0% 0% 100% 0%
Lisp SBCL 7.83 17,892 1403 7.88 0% 0% 100% 0%
mandelbrot
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 10.44 126,440 801 41.22 98% 98% 98% 100%
Lisp SBCL 4.09 46,684 2447 16.19 99% 99% 99% 99%
spectral-norm
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 3.80 66,688 627 14.75 97% 99% 96% 96%
Lisp SBCL 1.44 15,680 762 5.72 99% 99% 99% 99%
fannkuch-redux
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 32.01 70,960 1101 119.74 89% 93% 100% 92%
Lisp SBCL 9.63 32,388 1527 37.69 98% 95% 99% 99%
k-nucleotide
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 66.89 989,352 885 67.26 0% 0% 0% 100%
Lisp SBCL 10.29 512,240 2479 37.48 88% 99% 88% 90%
Racket

Welcome to Racket v8.2 [cs].

Lisp SBCL

SBCL 2.1.1