The Computer Language
Benchmarks Game

Racket versus Lisp SBCL fastest programs

Always look at the source code.

These are only the fastest programs. Look at the other programs. They may seem more-like a fair comparison to you.

pidigits
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 2.27 36,624 1136 2.30 100% 0% 1% 0%
Lisp SBCL 12.37 131,624 493 12.55 0% 0% 37% 63%
binary-trees
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 16.20 980,880 853 45.85 57% 75% 75% 76%
Lisp SBCL 11.41 321,692 932 24.35 53% 73% 42% 45%
reverse-complement
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 17.41 568,032 1030 22.12 15% 3% 100% 9%
Lisp SBCL 11.42 1,390,812 904 11.59 1% 1% 49% 51%
spectral-norm
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 6.25 38,976 627 23.69 94% 94% 97% 94%
Lisp SBCL 4.00 19,808 890 15.78 98% 99% 99% 99%
n-body
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 53.89 36,784 1689 56.81 35% 1% 5% 65%
Lisp SBCL 26.19 17,660 1403 26.35 91% 9% 0% 0%
fasta
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 19.46 36,716 1280 21.43 93% 7% 2% 8%
Lisp SBCL 7.09 17,724 1757 7.18 1% 1% 88% 12%
mandelbrot
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 19.92 128,228 801 75.95 95% 96% 95% 96%
Lisp SBCL 6.66 46,768 2447 26.53 99% 99% 100% 99%
k-nucleotide
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 100.10 417,588 885 105.50 3% 1% 4% 97%
Lisp SBCL 16.10 538,172 2479 57.76 98% 88% 86% 86%
fannkuch-redux
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 83.41 35,220 1101 326.64 100% 99% 94% 99%
Lisp SBCL 12.06 33,044 1527 47.21 95% 99% 98% 99%
regex-redux
source secs mem gz busy cpu load
Racket 26.20 1,242,924 729 57.35 65% 51% 17% 86%
Lisp SBCL   Failed
Racket

Welcome to Racket v7.7.

Lisp SBCL

SBCL 2.0.4