Haskell GHC versus F# .NET fastest programs

Always look at the source code.

These are only the fastest programs. Do some of them use manually vectorized SIMD? Look at the other programs. They may seem more-like a fair comparison to you.

regex-redux
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
Haskell GHC	1.07	345,128	2213	2.47	59% 44% 44% 83%
F# .NET	2.85	1,301,192	611	7.36	51% 92% 59% 56%
mandelbrot
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
Haskell GHC	1.51	37,504	1975	5.98	99% 99% 99% 99%
F# .NET	3.77	64,912	933	14.73	99% 97% 98% 97%
fasta
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
Haskell GHC	0.88	7,628	1882	3.32	94% 96% 93% 93%
F# .NET	1.14	120,528	1350	4.18	94% 94% 89% 91%
n-body
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
Haskell GHC	6.42	4,176	1883	6.47	0% 0% 0% 100%
F# .NET	6.88	34,744	1617	6.92	0% 100% 1% 0%
spectral-norm
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
Haskell GHC	1.47	3,964	987	5.71	97% 97% 97% 97%
F# .NET	1.55	31,916	853	5.83	92% 98% 93% 93%
fannkuch-redux
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
Haskell GHC	9.95	3,764	1113	39.18	95% 100% 99% 100%
F# .NET	8.65	31,784	1097	33.57	98% 99% 94% 98%
binary-trees
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
Haskell GHC	5.02	449,868	811	18.05	90% 85% 93% 91%
F# .NET	2.73	719,880	635	9.33	80% 89% 87% 85%
pidigits
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
Haskell GHC	1.64	7,792	360	2.06	9% 99% 7% 9%
F# .NET	0.82	34,428	905	0.83	1% 2% 96% 1%
k-nucleotide
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
Haskell GHC	22.02	638,132	1486	85.78	97% 99% 97% 97%
F# .NET	3.65	184,680	1907	12.58	94% 84% 85% 83%
reverse-complement
source	secs	mem	gz	busy	cpu load
Haskell GHC		Make Error
F# .NET	1.51	1,030,852	1140	4.19	93% 36% 58% 91%
Haskell GHC	The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 9.0.1
F# .NET	.NET SDK 5.0.100 Host Version: 5.0.0; Commit: cf258a14b7 <ServerGarbageCollection>true